News & Reviews
Honda Fit vs Toyota Prius
Consider this: The 2008 Toyota Prius base model costs 50 percent more than
the 2008 Honda Fit base model. Then again, the Prius is 50 percent more fuelefficient
than the Fit when you look at the EPA's figure for combined mpg. So
how does this add up?
You could save $8,425 right now by buying a $15,420 Honda Fit instead of the
$23,845 Toyota Prius. Of course, if the price of gasoline goes higher, then the
Prius with its EPA combined estimate of 46 mpg will pay you back for your
investment sooner than you'd expect. Then again, the Fit with its EPA combined
estimate of 30 mpg doesn't carry the same penalty of higher financing charges,
insurance costs and taxes as the more expensive Prius, plus the Toyota will be
needing a new $2,585 battery pack when the odometer shows 100,000-150,000
miles.
CONTENDERS
1 ST PLACE 2ND PLACE
2008 Honda Fit 2008 Toyota Prius
Low price + decent fuel economy + astounding utility = success. By a narrow
margin the Fit digs deep for a Honda win.
Which car is best? It sounds like the kind of question for one of those money
magazines. Yes, we've painted ourselves into a bit of a projected-cost corner
with this comparison of the base models of the 2008 Honda Fit and 2008 Toyota
Prius, but we think we can get out without stepping on too much wet paint.
It's, Like, Driving, You Know?
Driving a Toyota Prius is kind of the same thing as bowling with a Nintendo Wii.
Sure, a Prius has four wheels, two pedals and a steering wheel, but it doesn't
have the same bite of reality as hurling a 16-pound Brunswick Fury Pearl down
the lane.
To start with, its key isn't even a key; it's a smooth, rubbery fob that you stick in
the dash. Press the On button, various lights appear at the base of the
windshield, and you jiggle a joystick protruding from the dashboard to select a
gear.
You'll notice there are no distinct gear selections as you've grown to expect with
forward progress. Instead, the Prius wills itself down Main Street, or perhaps it's
drawn to the other side of town by a tractor beam. Occasionally, the gasoline
engine will wake up with a twitch, and shiver like it just got goose bumps. "Did
you just feel something?" your passengers will ask.
But the Prius isn't all that slow when you press the accelerator to the floor.
Through a complicated, continuously variable planetary gearset, the Prius can
simultaneously dump all its available electricity while maxing the gasoline
engine's output of 75 horsepower at 5,000 rpm. With a combined/blended output
of 110 hp, zero to 60 mph will take just 10.1 seconds (9.7 seconds with 1 foot of
rollout like on a drag strip).
When the "Slow! Kid Zone" speed bump arrives, you'll press the brake pedal and
notice a slight whirring sound and gentle, linear slowing. That's the regenerative
brake function at work, which is effectively like winding an electric motor
backward to make electricity. Then right before you almost rear end your
neighbor's Camry, there's a moment of perceived horizontal free fall when the
Prius switches to traditional mechanical brakes between 5 mph and zero. Our
best stop from 60 mph consumed 125 feet.
Light Effort
As you begin to twist the Prius' steering wheel, you'll find little resistance. This
electric-assisted power steering has a 19:1 steering ratio, one of the slowest
we've ever seen. You need to spin the springy wheel almost four times around to
do a U-turn in 34 feet.
It turns out the Prius is rather nimble despite its woozy Novocain-filled controls.
The base model 2008 Toyota Prius doesn't have electronic stability control, and
our skid pad results show 0.78g in lateral grip compared to a 0.71g registered for
a Prius with stability control. The base model Prius weaves through the cones at
63.3 mph compared to the frustrating fight with stability control that's required to
get a 61.3-mph run in the upmarket car.
Riding down the highway, the Prius is remarkably capable at soaking up bumps
and seams. The Prius is surprisingly svelte at 2,936 pounds despite its battery
pack. Compared to the Fit, the Prius maintains a substantial, planted feel over
more surface textures. And quiet tires and slippery aerodynamics help make the
Prius comfortably hushed, registering just 70 dBA at 70 mph.
Fun To Drive?
The all-knowing electronic screen that sits atop the Prius' dashboard has two
different pages showing your instantaneous, accumulating and average fuel
economy, as well as where the driving power is coming from and going to. And
guess what? Looking at it (responsibly, of course) will affect the way you drive.
Driving becomes "The Economy Game, brought to you in three parts by Toyota."
It's nearly impossible to resist counting how many little green cars you've earned
that represent how much electricity you've generated. Or how many times you
can stack up blocks, maxing out the 100-mpg bar graphs. Or learning the
greatest indicated speed you can reach before the gasoline engine starts up and
begins knocking down the mpg bar.
Our score? Over 675 miles in the Prius, we averaged 42 mpg, with a best result
of 51 mpg on one tank. In comparison, the Fit returned an average of 28 mpg
over 800 miles with a best tank of 38 mpg.
The Prius is fun to drive in a strange, arcade-style way. It feeds your sense of
social responsibility and you become a weenie hypermiler.
Fit for the Fight?
Which brings us to the base model 2008 Honda Fit. There's a reason it costs
$8,425 less than the Prius. For starters, it's not chock-full o' expensive tech and
168 nickel-metal hydride batteries. Unless you're really good at mental
gymnastics, playing the Fit's version of the Economy Game only happens with a
calculator in your hand at the gas station.
So there's that, and the Fit doesn't have a keyless remote or cruise control or
aluminum wheels or audio/HVAC buttons on its steering wheel or floor mats or
even map lights. Frankly, we were half expecting to find four window cranks
when we popped open the Fit's doors.
The Fit does have great interior packaging, however. With all the seats up, it
offers 7 cubic feet more cargo volume than the Prius; once the seats go down
there are 12 cubic feet more. The Fit's second-row seat bottoms flip up to
accommodate tall items like a bicycle as long as it measures less than 50 by 50
inches.
There's even a way to convert the second row into what Honda euphemistically
calls "Refresh Mode" that was characterized by one of our editors as "Business
Class Seating."
So what you get for $15,420 is a small car with a big interior that's powered by a
high-revving four-cylinder engine that earns above-average fuel economy. But it's
hardly a penalty box, and you might be happy to learn all of its driving dynamics
will be familiar.
Not a Good Sport
To be honest, though, the Honda Fit doesn't put its best foot forward with this
budget-friendly model, largely because of its automatic transmission. Like so
many automatics in this efficiency-minded age, the Fit's five-speed strives to get
to top gear as soon as possible.
At freeway speeds, it's so reluctant to downshift from 5th to 4th that you lose
patience and pin the gas pedal to the floor...and there goes your fuel economy.
Then the transmission decides you're in a really big hurry, so it skips over 4th to
3rd. Adding insult to injury is the fact that there's no way to manually select 4th
gear as the PRNDL mirrors its programming with either D or D3 positions.
Repeat this profanity-filled fiasco several dozen times, and you'll be convinced to
opt for the available manual transmission for less money, or the Sport model's
paddle shifters in concert with the automatic for a little more. The automatic
doesn't do the Fit any favors for acceleration either. With its 109-hp 1.5-liter
inline-4 driving the front wheels, the Fit arrives at 60 mph in 11.4 seconds (11.1
seconds with a 1-foot rollout like on a drag strip).
The base model Fit has narrower tires than the Sport model, so our best efforts
resulted in a 0.75g orbit around the skid pad and a sporty-feeling 62.3-mph pass
through the slalom. (In comparison, a Fit Sport produces 0.80g lateral
acceleration and a 67.5-mph pass.) Put the brakes on and the 2,517-pound Fit
comes to a halt in 131 feet.
The True Cost of Ownership
Thanks to a proprietary function called Edmunds.com True Cost to Own
(TCOSM), we can answer the $8,425 question when it comes time to determine
the relative value of the 2008 Honda Fit and 2008 Toyota Prius.
Is it more financially beneficial to buy a Prius base model for $23,845 or a Fit
base model for $15,420? The EPA says the Prius earns 46 mpg in combined city
and highway use, while the Fit's combined rating is 30 mpg. If you drive 15,000
miles a year, the Fit will consume 174 gallons of fuel more than the Prius. If you
drive the same number of miles over the course of five years, Edmunds.com
TCO calculations predict the five-year aggregated fuel costs will total $11,480 for
the Fit and $7,911 for the Prius, or a difference of $3,569.
This means the Prius would still be $4,856 shy of breaking even with fuel-cost
savings alone.
Here's the math: Difference in purchase prices minus difference in fuel cost =
perceived difference in operating cost. That is: $8,425-$3,569 = $4,856.
But the Edmunds TCO also accounts for financing charges, insurance payments,
taxes, regular maintenance costs and repairs, so the cost gap between the Fit
and Prius over five years is even greater, an out-of-pocket difference of $5,351.
In other words, choosing the Fit over the Prius would mean you'd still be ahead
by $3,074 ($8,425-$5,351 = $3,074).
We're working on a side-by-side version of TCO, but you can look at each one
individually for the 2008 Honda Fit and 2008 Toyota Prius. Extra points if you
know how to manage split-screen viewing.
Guzzle-lator
So how long does it take to break even on your investment in a 2008 Toyota
Prius? We have another proprietary tool called the Gas Mileage Savings
Calculator. It uses some TCO data, and also offers you the opportunity to input
your typical monthly mileage, your ZIP code, two different vehicles and your best
guess at the cost of a gallon of gas to see how many months it would take until
that magic break-even point occurs.
For the purposes of this particular comparison, we input 1,250 miles of driving
per month (the same 15,000 miles per year as above), a price of $4.49 per gallon
of gas (typical for Santa Monica, California), this 2008 Toyota Prius and a 2008
Honda Fit for the trade-in sale value.
It takes 189 months or more than 15 years to break even on fuel. And that's well
beyond the battery-swap schedule. As the tool notes, "You will not save any
money by trading in your current vehicle for the fuel-efficient vehicle you have
selected."
And the Winner Is...
At this point, our usual 100-point comparison-test score card would appear, well,
pointless. But be that as it may, the 2008 Honda Fit still comes out on top in this
comparison by a slim margin of 1.9 points. Usually we declare such a close finish
the equivalent of a tie, but the Edmunds True Cost of Ownership makes the 2008
Toyota Prius the obvious runner-up.
As our score sheets indicate, the Honda Fit earns points for its obvious price
advantage, decent fuel economy and remarkable interior packaging. Even by
heavily weighting fuel consumption at 30 percent of the total score, the Toyota
Prius can't manage to overtake the Fit's lead in the scoring.
So the 2008 Honda Fit is our choice. When it comes to the complicated
issue of small-car goodness, sometimes the simple answers are the most
effective.
The manufacturers provided Edmunds these vehicles for the purposes of
evaluation.
Return to News & Reviews
Know of any News & Reviews not listed here? Drop us a line if you think there's something we should know!
|
